Home Neural Network Pitch Deck Teardown: Protecto’s $4M seed deck

Pitch Deck Teardown: Protecto’s $4M seed deck

0
Pitch Deck Teardown: Protecto’s $4M seed deck

[ad_1]

In an period the place knowledge is king and its quantity and complexity are exploding, Protecto goals to eradicate the long-standing dilemma companies face between leveraging AI’s energy whereas guaranteeing knowledge privateness. Because the adoption of generative AI instruments like ChatGPT skyrockets, wayward knowledge turns into simpler to seek out, course of and do naughty issues with. Protecto’s APIs are designed to guard delicate knowledge throughout the AI life cycle whereas sustaining its utility.

The corporate introduced it raised a $4 million seed funding spherical led by Collectively Fund, with contributions from Higher Capital, FortyTwo VC, Arali Ventures and Speciale Make investments. This spherical boosts Protecto’s whole funding to $5 million.


We’re searching for extra distinctive pitch decks to tear down, so if you wish to submit your personal, right here’s how you are able to do that

Slides on this deck

Protecto made redactions to the short-term and five-year targets and to particular particulars of the near-term product roadmap earlier than submitting its deck to TechCrunch. The timeline for the targets and milestones associated to the seed funding spherical was additionally redacted. Nonetheless, there’s lots to be taught from the 14-slide deck:

  1. Cowl slide
  2. Downside slide
  3. Urgency slide
  4. Platform interstitial slide
  5. Expertise overview slide
  6. Outcomes slide
  7. Answer slide
  8. Case research slide 1
  9. Case research slide 2
  10.  Aggressive alternate options slide
  11.  Group slide
  12.  Go to market slide
  13.  Roadmap slide
  14.  Ask and use of funds slide

Three issues to like about Protecto’s pitch deck

There’s a lot lacking from this deck, however there are some good issues to focus on, too.

Aggressive alternate options

This slide doesn’t speak about direct opponents (there are one or two). However the firm does a great job displaying this info anyway:

[Slide 10] Aggressive alternate options are a good way to look into aggressive landscapes. Picture Credit: Protecto

Aggressive alternate options are companies, strategies or approaches which might be completely different from yours however that fulfill the identical buyer wants or clear up the identical issues. As an example, if you happen to run a espresso store, a direct competitor can be one other espresso store, whereas a aggressive different is perhaps a teahouse or a fast-food restaurant that additionally sells espresso amongst different drinks. These opponents matter as a result of they signify different options on your clients, highlighting the significance of understanding broader market dynamics and buyer preferences.

Understanding and analyzing these aggressive alternate options may be highly effective as a further layer of perception, uncovering potential alternatives for differentiation and serving to to determine unmet buyer wants. Having stated all of that, Protecto ought to have included direct opponents, however this slide remains to be an important instance of how a startup can discover its place out there.

Helloooo, crew

This crew slide is so stable — the one draw back is that they put it because the eleventh slide:

[Slide 11] A rock-solid crew slide. Picture Credit: Protecto

To face out in a out of the blue crowded AI area, you’d finest deliver receipts that present you’ve received the chops to tug it off. The left-hand facet of the slide has an excessive amount of data (why are funding, product and clients on the crew slide?) however the half on the correct has a ton of nice info.

In accordance with his LinkedIn, CEO Amar Kanagaraj spent virtually eight years at Microsoft, together with a stint in search and AI. CTO Baskaran Alagarsamy spent seven years as a “supervisor” at Apple India. I’d have cherished to see extra element on precisely what he was managing there (and why this slide says 18 years, whereas his LinkedIn says seven years), however that is the start of a very stable crew. If I have been investing on this area, a crew of this caliber would pique my curiosity and I’d most likely arrange a gathering.

A sublime resolution

Privateness and AI can get brain-achingly difficult, quick. I recognize Protecto’s efforts to simplify it to some extent the place most individuals can fathom what’s happening within the tech.

[Slide 5] Take delicate, non-public knowledge. Substitute with related, faux knowledge. Is smart to me. Picture Credit: Protecto

Three issues that Protecto might have improved

Pitch deck design isn’t often that vital, however the design of this deck is especially unhealthy. There are additionally much more severe flaws hidden amongst these pages.

These case research aren’t case research

In a 14-slide deck, Protecto wastes slide 4 as an interstitial (it simply says “our platform”). It then wastes two slides with the title “case research.” Nevertheless, a extra correct time period can be “use instances.”

[Slide 8] That’s not a case research. Picture Credit: Protecto

A full case research would come with much more details about how profitable it was (did the product achieve eradicating all of the confidential knowledge? How was that measured?), how lengthy it took to combine, and the way joyful the shopper was with the answer. Slide 9 is one other “case research” that’s related: a use case, not a case research.

The headline of a slide is a promise the remainder of the slide has to satisfy. On this case, I used to be let down each occasions, anticipating one sort of data and getting one other. Correct case research would have been actually useful in telling the story right here.

Not an important “use of funds” slide

Redactions apart, there’s not a lot right here.

[Slide 14] Virtually fully irrelevant info. Picture Credit: Protecto

The corporate got down to increase $3 million. The usage of funds, nevertheless, is so fluffy; each bullet level right here makes me need to ask: “However how are you aware it’s working?”

  • Increase engineering: Sure, however why, with what purpose, and the way a lot?
  • Drive advertising: Sure, however with what targets? By when? How a lot development?
  • Construct channel gross sales: Sure, however which channels are you going after first? Why?
  • Drive developer evangelism: What does that even imply?
  • Outline the class: ???

Mainly, all of that is simply corporate-grade jargon. Even when the founders themselves purchase it, traders most likely received’t.

Sure, it’s scary to get predictive and particular. What if you happen to fail? All plans and projections are predictions. We all know. The traders know. The purpose is to point out the way you’re considering via these predictions; traders can be taught quite a bit about you as a founder. That’s extraordinarily useful — and never optionally available.

This can be a brainstorm, not a plan

[Slide 12] This go-to-market is simply too imprecise. Picture Credit: Protecto

There’s a lot of issues with this slide. The corporate is arguing it’s going to develop via product-led development. That’s nice and all, however that not often works in isolation — it must be achieved at the side of different advertising channels. “For those who construct it, they may come” isn’t a factor within the crowded startup ecosystem.

I’d need to know what these integrations really imply, and the way clients discover them. I’d like to know how Snowflake and Databricks play into this plan. And what it’s imagining with “resolution integrators”?

This slide is a pile of phrases on a web page, not an actionable, measurable go-to-market plan.

After which there’s all of the stuff lacking from the deck total …

  • How large is the marketplace for this form of factor?
  • What traction do you need to date? Did the “case research” pay? If sure, how a lot? Did they proceed to make use of the product?
  • There’s nothing concerning the enterprise mannequin: How will they cost? How a lot?
  • How is that this defendable? Does the corporate have patents? Is there some form of particular magic sauce?

The issue with this deck total is that it doesn’t clarify why this downside is tough to unravel and why this firm is the one to unravel it. Perhaps it’s overly simplified within the deck, however simply based mostly on what’s right here, I feel I might spherical up a handful of builders and construct most of this product over the span of a pair weeks. That can not be true, can it? As a result of in that case, there’s nothing right here. However since that’s most likely not the case, it signifies that there’s merely an issue with the storytelling. Sure, this can be a large downside; now clarify why it’s a hard-to-solve downside.

The total pitch deck


If you would like your personal pitch deck teardown featured on TechCrunch, right here’s extra info. Additionally, take a look at all our Pitch Deck Teardowns all collected in a single useful place for you!

[ad_2]