Pricey crew,

I want to thank Intel for offering us with the costly software program and {hardware} by devcloud. I’m grateful.

I’m utilizing devcloud for my graduate analysis program within the College, which relies on DPC++ for FPGAs.

Compiler model discrepancies in several nodes

I spotted that for each compilation and execution of DPC++ applications, one of many Nodes with Stratix 10 OneAPI needs to be used as proven under.

When the atmosphere variables are sourced within the nodes utilizing the next command,

supply /decide/intel/oneapi/setvars.sh

totally different atmosphere variables are presumably set as a result of /decide/intel/ discuss with totally different recordsdata in several nodes.

So, as a workaround,  I made it a follow to compile DPC++ applications for FPGA by defining the node title. For instance,

qsub -l nodes=s001-n142:ppn=2 -d . ~/integer_correspondence_compile_10k

and I execute the binary by logging into that node particularly, which is a workaround for me.

New compiler hyperlinks, breaks the circulate

The next traces are excerpts from /decide/intel/oneapi/setvars.sh with line numbers.

712 if [[ $fpga == *"$a10"* ]]
713 then
714     export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/decide/intel/oneapi/intel_a10gx_pac/linux64/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
715 elif [[ $fpga == *"$s10"* ]]
716 then
717     export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/decide/intel/oneapi/intel_s10sx_pac/linux64/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
718 elif [[ $fpga == *"$agilex"* ]]
719 then

Nonetheless, the listing intel_a10gx_pac doesn’t exist inside /decide/intel/oneapi with the current replace.

However that is principally required when operating the binary file.

Now, I’m not even in a position to synthesize within the first place.

Right here is an try and compile the vector-add program from oneAPI-samples git repo

Am I doing one thing fallacious or is it a bug with the brand new replace?