Home Machine Learning ChatGPT Is Not a Physician. Hidden risks in searching for medical… | by Rachel Draelos, MD, PhD | Feb, 2024

ChatGPT Is Not a Physician. Hidden risks in searching for medical… | by Rachel Draelos, MD, PhD | Feb, 2024

0
ChatGPT Is Not a Physician. Hidden risks in searching for medical… | by Rachel Draelos, MD, PhD | Feb, 2024

[ad_1]

Hidden risks in searching for medical recommendation from LLMs

Picture by Creator. 2 sub-images generated by DALLE-2

Final 12 months, ChatGPT handed the US Medical Licensing Examination and was reported to be “extra empathetic” than actual docs. ChatGPT at the moment has round 180 million customers; if a mere 10% of them have requested ChatGPT a medical query, that’s already a inhabitants two occasions bigger than New York Metropolis utilizing ChatGPT like a physician. There’s an ongoing explosion of medical chatbot startups constructing skinny wrappers round ChatGPT to dole out medical recommendation. However ChatGPT isn’t a physician, and utilizing ChatGPT for medical recommendation isn’t solely in opposition to OpenAI’s Utilization insurance policies, it may be harmful.

On this article, I establish 4 key issues with utilizing present general-purpose chatbots to reply patient-posed medical questions. I present examples of every downside utilizing actual conversations with ChatGPT. I additionally clarify why constructing a chatbot that may safely reply patient-posed questions is totally completely different than constructing a chatbot that may reply USMLE questions. Lastly, I describe steps that everybody can take — sufferers, entrepreneurs, docs, and firms like OpenAI — to make chatbots medically safer.

Notes

For readability I exploit the time period “ChatGPT,” however the article applies to all publicly out there general-purpose giant language fashions (LLMs), together with ChatGPT, GPT-4, Llama2, Gemini, and others. A couple of LLMs particularly designed for drugs do exist, like Med-PaLM; this text isn’t about these fashions. I’m centered right here on on general-purpose chatbots as a result of (a) they’ve probably the most customers; (b) they’re straightforward to entry; and (c) many sufferers are already utilizing them for medical recommendation.

Within the chats with ChatGPT, I present verbatim quotes of ChatGPT’s response, with ellipses […] to point materials that was ignored for brevity. I by no means ignored something that may’ve modified my evaluation of ChatGPT’s response. For completeness, the complete chat transcripts are supplied in a Phrase doc hooked up to the tip of this text. The phrases “Affected person:” and “ChatGPT:” are dialogue tags and have been added afterwards for readability. These dialogue tags weren’t a part of the prompts or responses.

[ad_2]